Shifting over to load noise levels then, the STRIX R9 380X continues to impress. At 36.4dB the only noise coming from our system is closed loop liquid cooler for the CPU. ASUS’s sweet spot seems to be around 70C – right where we like to see it for an open air cooled card – with the R9 380X reaching equilibrium at 67C for Crysis 3 and 71C for FurMark.įinally with idle noise, the zero fan speed idle technology on the STRIX lineup means that the STRIX R9 380X gets top marks here. Even without any direct fan airflow the STRIX R9 380X holds at 30C. With idle temperatures ASUS’s 0db Fan technology doesn’t hamper the R9 380X at all. This despite the fact that the R9 380X uses AMD’s newer throttling technology, and consequently it gets closer to its true board limit than the 7970 ever did. Otherwise as was the case with Crysis 3, the R9 380X holds a slight edge over the 7970 on power consumption. At best we can say it’s between the GTX 960 and GTX 970, with the former offering performance not too far off for less power. Moving over to FurMark our results get compressed by quite a bit (we’re using a GTX 960 with a fairly high power limit), but even then the R9 380X’s power consumption isn’t in AMD’s favor. And for that matter the R9 380X shows a slight edge over the 7970, delivering similar gaming performance for around 16W less at the wall. With AMD opting to push the envelope there to maintain price/performance parity with the GTX 970, while the R9 380X is a fair bit slower than the R9 390, it saves a lot of power in the process. The one bit of good news here for AMD is that while the power consumption of the R9 380X isn’t great, it’s still better balanced than the R9 390. AMD’s power draw under games is essentially one class worse than NVIDIA’s – the R9 380X draws power like a GTX 970, but delivers performance only slightly ahead of a GTX 960. R9 380 just wasn’t very competitive on power consumption compared to Maxwell, and R9 380X doesn’t do anything to change this. Meanwhile the GTX 960, though slightly slower, is drawing 74W less at the wall.
The problem for AMD is that this is smack-dab in GTX 970 territory. Power consumption is up slightly thanks to the additional CUs and the additional CPU load from the higher framerate, with the reference clocked R9 380X coming in at 299W, while ASUS’s factory overclock pushes that to 304W. Moving on to power consumption under Crysis 3, like so many other aspects of R9 380X, its performance here is very close to the original R9 380. 75-76W is typical for a Tonga card on our GPU testbed. Starting with idle power consumption, the ASUS card comes in right where we’d expect it. The ASUS R9 380X has no problem holding its full boost clockspeed in games, both at its stock speed of 1030MHz and when downclocked to 970MHz.
0 kommentar(er)
